<1> Chick lit’s controversial reputation within literary circles
poses challenges to critics seeking to analyze gender politics in
contemporary culture through the context of popular forms. However,
Stephanie Harzewski’s Chick Lit and Postfeminism negotiates the critical
terrain pragmatically as the book examines how chick lit’s synthesis of
genres and literary traditions has positioned the genre as “the most
visible form of postfeminist fiction” (8). Side-stepping questions about
the validity of academic attention being paid to chick lit, Harzewski
offers up a captivating defense of the genre as she outlines its roots
in a combination of several literary forms including romance, bildungsroman
and the novel of manners. Further, Harzewski claims that as “an
underanalyzed body of postmodern fiction, chick lit serves as an
accessible portal into contemporary gender politics and questions of
cultural value” (5), and applies Fredric Jameson’s understanding of the
postmodern as “‘the consumption of sheer commodification as process’” to
chick lit, which, she explains, is engaged in constructing narratives
of acquisition that directly posit a lifestyle informed by “media
capitalism” (10-11). Thus, for Harzewski, not only does chick lit’s
representation of gender pose particular complications when we consider
its popularity, but the aversion that literary critics have shown toward
the genre has limited the exploration of its cultural implications.
Ultimately, Chick Lit and Postfeminism presents a defense of
chick lit by outlining the literary traditions it has emerged from and
assesses cultural ideologies (particularly around gender and capitalism)
that the genre is invested in producing. 1>
Sunday, 19 August 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment